Inspect index composition, sector concentration, strategic themes, and public/private research links across a static Israeli equity-market dataset.
Weight by economic sector in the active lens.
Research tags mapped to resilience and public-market context.
Shared constituents and weight overlap between the selected lenses.
Sortable, searchable rows. Weights are static research weights, not live TASE values.
What the static model does and does not claim.
Official links and local curation notes.
Israeli strategic capability does not live only in private startups. Banks, insurers, telecoms, defense primes, semiconductor suppliers, energy operators, food retailers, and infrastructure companies shape the public-market layer of the same resilience thesis. This app makes that layer easier to inspect without turning it into a stock-picking product.
A useful session starts by choosing an index, checking sector concentration, opening the overlap panel, and then filtering for a strategic theme such as banks, semiconductors, defense, energy, food security, or communications. When a Claw & Talon profile exists, the table links back into the company-level research record.
TASE offers official data services and API products, but live or delayed market-data integrations require the right access path and should run build-side or server-side. The public browser client deliberately uses a static JSON file so no credential or licensed feed is exposed.
Index membership is useful because it shows where public capital-market attention, liquidity, and domestic institutional exposure tend to concentrate. It does not, by itself, say whether a company is strategically important, attractive, fragile, cheap, expensive, under-owned, or available to any reader. A bank can dominate an index because it is large and liquid. A defense company can matter strategically even if its weight is smaller than a bank. A semiconductor supplier can carry alliance relevance that is not obvious from a simple sector label. The app is designed to make those differences visible enough for further research.
The most useful signal is usually the combination of weight, sector, and role. A high-weight bank says something about financial-system concentration. A high-weight insurer says something about long-term savings channels and institutional capital. A communications provider points to operational continuity and critical services. Energy and food constituents point to domestic resilience, supply continuity, and import-substitution questions. Technology rows need a more careful read because software, cyber, semiconductor equipment, payments, and communications infrastructure behave differently under stress.
The overlap view is meant to prevent a common mistake: treating each named index as if it provides a completely separate exposure. Broad indices often share the same large constituents, while sector and theme lenses can still be heavily shaped by a few dominant names. Comparing overlap helps a reader see whether a thesis is genuinely diversified across the Israeli public market or mostly a different wrapper around the same banks, technology anchors, real-estate operators, or energy companies.
The public/private bridge is intentionally conservative. The app links to a Claw & Talon profile only when there is an existing profile in the site database. Absence of a profile does not mean a company is unimportant, and presence of a profile does not imply endorsement. It simply means there is a deeper local research page that may help connect the listed company to the broader Israeli strategic-technology ecosystem.
Users should verify current index rules, live constituents, corporate actions, float adjustments, and weights with TASE or a licensed data provider before making operational, legal, financial, or portfolio decisions. This static app is best used as a research map: identify concentration, find public-market anchors, compare sector lenses, and decide which sources or company records deserve a closer review.
