Perimeter 81
Last updated: Jul 31, 2026
Perimeter 81 built a cloud-native secure access and SASE platform for distributed workforces, combining zero-trust access, private networking, and security controls. Check Point completed its acquisition in September 2023; the technology is now presented through Check Point SASE and related Quantum SASE offerings rather than as an independent startup.
Visit WebsiteCompany Overview
Perimeter 81 was a Tel Aviv cybersecurity company founded in 2018 by Amit Bareket and Sagi Gidali. Its core product replaced parts of the legacy VPN and appliance model with a cloud-managed service for connecting employees, contractors, offices, and applications. The platform combined zero-trust network access (ZTNA), software-defined perimeter controls, private backbone connectivity, network segmentation, secure web access, and centralized policy administration. The value proposition was operational as much as technical: deploy secure connectivity without hardware, apply access policies by identity and context, and give administrators a single console for a distributed environment.
The customer problem is durable. Organizations have moved applications and users across SaaS, public cloud, branch offices, and home networks, while older perimeter-based architectures often grant broader network access than a user needs. SASE and SSE products address that mismatch by bringing identity, traffic inspection, segmentation, and policy enforcement closer to users and applications. Perimeter 81 focused on making that transition accessible to mid-market and distributed organizations, including customers using managed-service providers and channel partners. Check Point said at the acquisition close that the business served more than 3,000 customers and had more than 200 employees; the former company site also reported approximately 250 team members and $165 million in funding, but those figures should be treated as historical rather than current standalone-company metrics.
Competition is intense and increasingly favors vendors able to bundle networking, identity, endpoint, cloud, and threat-prevention functions. Relevant alternatives include Zscaler Private Access, Cloudflare Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Cisco Secure Access, Netskope Private Access, Twingate, and incumbent VPN or firewall platforms. Perimeter 81's plausible edge was ease of deployment, a unified cloud console, a private global backbone, and a relatively simple migration path from VPNs. Those are useful execution advantages, but not obviously durable technical moats: larger platforms can reproduce the principal controls, bundle them into wider contracts, and use existing security telemetry and sales channels.
Commercial traction is evidenced by the reported customer and employee base, prior funding history, and Check Point's decision to acquire 100% of the company for total consideration of $503.1 million, as disclosed in Check Point's 2023 annual filing. The acquisition also changes how traction should be interpreted. Check Point completed the transaction in September 2023, launched an integrated Quantum SASE offering shortly afterward, and continues to host Check Point SASE materials that retain Perimeter 81 product references. This makes the asset commercially validated and strategically useful, but no longer an independent venture with a separately observable revenue, headcount, fundraising, or product-roadmap profile.
The defense and national-security relevance is credible but indirect. Secure access, least-privilege segmentation, contractor connectivity, and policy-controlled access to cloud or on-premise systems are relevant to defense contractors, critical infrastructure operators, and government-adjacent organizations. The platform is enabling cybersecurity infrastructure, not a defense-native mission system, and the public evidence does not establish classified deployments, government contracts, or defense-specific accreditation. The main diligence question is therefore integration and assurance: whether Check Point's product provides the required identity, logging, data-residency, availability, and administrative controls for high-consequence environments without creating unacceptable vendor concentration or migration risk.
Dual-Use Assessment
The underlying ZTNA and SASE capabilities have substantive commercial and security-sector applicability: least-privilege access, segmentation, secure contractor connectivity, and centralized policy enforcement can support defense contractors, critical infrastructure, and government-adjacent environments. The dual-use case is enabling infrastructure rather than a defense-native system, and public evidence does not establish classified deployments or government contracts.
Strategic Fit Assessment
Perimeter 81 demonstrated meaningful product-market traction and strategic value, culminating in Check Point's completed acquisition for disclosed total consideration of $503.1 million. That outcome is evidence of commercial validation, not a current standalone financing opportunity. As an acquired asset with limited independent disclosure, it should not be treated as an strategically relevant startup priority; diligence should instead focus on how effectively Check Point is integrating the technology, retaining customers, preserving service quality, and maintaining product differentiation.
Strategic Value to U.S.-Israel Alliance
The acquired capability strengthens Check Point's position in secure access, SASE, and SSE, categories that sit beneath enterprise and security-sector resilience. Its strategic value comes from combining cloud-managed connectivity with identity-aware controls and Check Point's broader security platform. The asset is relevant to distributed organizations and regulated or defense-adjacent users, but its value is now primarily as part of Check Point's platform rather than as an independent Israeli startup.
Key Technologies
- Zero-trust network access (ZTNA)
- Software-defined perimeter and identity-aware policy enforcement
- Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) and Security Service Edge (SSE)
- Cloud-managed private global backbone and full-mesh connectivity
- Network segmentation and least-privilege access
- Secure web gateway and cloud access security controls
- Centralized policy, identity integration, and access administration
Use Cases & Applications
- Replacing or reducing reliance on legacy enterprise VPNs
- Identity-based access to private cloud and on-premise applications
- Secure connectivity for remote and hybrid employees
- Time-bounded access for contractors, partners, and managed-service users
- Segmented branch-office and site-to-site connectivity
- Secure web and internet access for distributed workforces
- Controlled access to sensitive systems for defense contractors and critical-infrastructure operators
Sources and verification
This profile is based on public-source research, Claw & Talon curation, and editorial judgment. Inclusion does not imply endorsement, partnership, investment, or a recommendation to transact. Readers should still confirm current status, customers, funding, and product claims before relying on this profile. The editorial policy explains how profiles are researched, where automated drafting is used, and how corrections work.
This record lists 6 public references used for company identity, status, positioning, or material-claim review.
Public sources
The links below are visible public references used for source discipline around company identity, status, funding, customer, acquisition, public-company, or other material claims where available.
- checkpoint.com Public source used for profile verification.
- perimeter81.com Public source used for profile verification.
- checkpoint.com Public source used for profile verification.
- checkpoint.com Public source used for profile verification.
- sc1.checkpoint.com Public source used for profile verification.
- Official website
- Profile update timestamp Last updated in the Claw & Talon database on Jul 31, 2026.
Investor Lens
What this entry is
Acquired asset
Why it may matter
Perimeter 81 may matter as a Cybersecurity entry with not currently an investable standalone company for Israeli technology research.
How an independent investor should read this
Not currently an investable standalone company. Read this profile as a starting point for independent verification, not as a recommendation or suitability assessment.
Evidence to verify
- Verify current status
- Verify technical claims
- Verify regulatory/export-control issues
Main investor questions
- Is this entry a benchmark, buyer, ecosystem node, acquired asset, or strategic reference rather than a live startup opportunity?
- What does this reference clarify about buyers, sector structure, public-market context, or strategic demand?
- Does the dual-use claim map to actual commercial and government/defense/resilience buyer evidence?
- What evidence would change the thesis or show that the profile is stale?
What not to infer
- Inclusion does not imply endorsement.
- Inclusion does not imply allocation availability or current fundraising.
- Scores do not indicate investment suitability or expected returns.
- Strategic importance does not automatically imply venture return potential.
Diligence questions
- What evidence verifies Perimeter 81's current customer traction, deployment status, and revenue concentration?
- Which technical claims are independently demonstrable today, and which remain roadmap or pilot-stage assertions?
- Where does the product create real defense, intelligence, critical-infrastructure, or emergency-response value beyond ordinary commercial adoption?
- How does the platform integrate into existing SOC, cloud, identity, or compliance workflows without adding operational burden?
- Is the company a live venture opportunity, a mature strategic reference, an acquired asset, or primarily a market-mapping entry?
Related sector
See the Cybersecurity sector page for market context, related subcategories, and other Israeli companies in this part of the database.
Related companies
Need a diligence readout?
Use the profile and related checklists as a starting point. If the decision needs more context, request a company screen, founder-call prep, diligence memo, or sector readout.